<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CYVR for FSX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonpatch.wordpress.com/2007/12/21/cyvr-for-fsx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonpatch.wordpress.com/2007/12/21/cyvr-for-fsx/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Flight Simulation, and life.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Spanier</title>
		<link>http://jonpatch.wordpress.com/2007/12/21/cyvr-for-fsx/#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Spanier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonpatch.wordpress.com/2007/12/21/cyvr-for-fsx/#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>Comox for FSX (is there one?)

Hi Jon, Do you know of any FSX compatible Comox package that also works with UT and Vic+ and Van+.  I've tried Vern's FS2004 version but get too many scenery conflicts.

Cheers
Bernie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comox for FSX (is there one?)</p>
<p>Hi Jon, Do you know of any FSX compatible Comox package that also works with UT and Vic+ and Van+.  I&#8217;ve tried Vern&#8217;s FS2004 version but get too many scenery conflicts.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Bernie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://jonpatch.wordpress.com/2007/12/21/cyvr-for-fsx/#comment-8686</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonpatch.wordpress.com/2007/12/21/cyvr-for-fsx/#comment-8686</guid>
		<description>I can't hide the fact I'm disappointed CYVR won't be developed but I completely understand considering the state of MS FlightSim right now.

With FS users split down the middle between FS9 and FSX I can see why development seems to have slowed on many products.

On another front, Jon, could you contact me at the e:mail address I listed for this message?

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t hide the fact I&#8217;m disappointed CYVR won&#8217;t be developed but I completely understand considering the state of MS FlightSim right now.</p>
<p>With FS users split down the middle between FS9 and FSX I can see why development seems to have slowed on many products.</p>
<p>On another front, Jon, could you contact me at the e:mail address I listed for this message?</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
